<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Things To Know About The 2010 Roth IRA Conversion Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/</link>
	<description>Helping You Make Cents Of Investing and Financial Planning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: TJB</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-7721</link>
		<dc:creator>TJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-7721</guid>
		<description>FollowUp:
The Inflation Rate for 2009 turned out to be negative -- (-0.34-percent).

http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/HistoricalInflation.aspx?dsInflation_currentPage=0

The last time that this happened was 1955.

Regards,
TJB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FollowUp:<br />
The Inflation Rate for 2009 turned out to be negative &#8212; (-0.34-percent).</p>
<p><a href="http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/HistoricalInflation.aspx?dsInflation_currentPage=0" rel="nofollow">http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/HistoricalInflation.aspx?dsInflation_currentPage=0</a></p>
<p>The last time that this happened was 1955.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
TJB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-7254</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-7254</guid>
		<description>The new Roth IRA Conversion rule is a great one to take advantage of this year. With taxes in the long term going only one way (up!) converting now can make a lot of sense for those with higher incomes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new <a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/" >Roth IRA Conversion</a> rule is a great one to take advantage of this year. With taxes in the long term going only one way (up!) converting now can make a lot of sense for those with higher incomes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJB</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-7132</link>
		<dc:creator>TJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-7132</guid>
		<description>Gary,
You make a very good point and for some people it would make sense to convert in stages over several years to stay in the lower marginal tax bracket.   However, I believe that if an individual is close to the top of their existing marginal tax bracket it makes sense to convert becuse if it takes more than 5 years to convert in portions the Congress is likely to change the marginal tax brackets within that time frame anyway.  Soemtimes it is better dealing with the devil that you know than the devil that you don&#039;t know.
However, folks do have to understand how the marginal tax brackets work.  Whatever tax bracket a person is currently in, any additional income up to that marginal tax bracket limit is taxed at that same marginal rate.  Should an individulas income push them into the next marginal tax bracket, say from 25-percent to 28-percent, does not mean that their entire income is now taxed at that 28-percent rate.  For example, if an individuals income pushed them from the 25-percent into the 28-percent tax bracket by $10,000, then the individual would have to pay 28-percent on that $10,000 or $2800, whereas the the previous $10,000 of income was taxed at 25-percent and paying $2500.

From the numbers that I have seen on various websites I anticiapte that the final inflation number for 2009 will show a near zero inflation rate for 2009 (if not negative).  The upward limit on the marginal tax brackets will probably not move upward very much,  if at all.

The real threat to the marginal tax brackets is that the law that Pres Bush signed in 2001 expires on 1 Jan 2011 (after its 10-year life) and not only do the marginal tax brackets rollback to their 2001 levels, but all the various tax credits that individuals and small business have enjoyed for the past 10 years will disappear as well.  This will mean that the 10% bracket disappears altogether.  I think (but have not confirmed) that the others brackets breakdown as follows: The 15% remains the same, the 25% moves to 28%, the 28% becomes 33%, the 33% become 35%, and the current 35% becomes 39.6%.  The upper limits on the marginal tax brackets will probably move a little higher as well.

(Here is my guess, or prediction, on what will happen ---- Congress will see that the economy has not yet recovered enough to allow the marginal tax brackets to revert back to their 2001 levels.  They will also not have put forth any time and effort to work out what a new tax bill should contain or see which tax credits are working and which need to be changed.  Therefore, Congress will just change the sunset date on the rollback from 1 Jan 2011 to 1 Jan 2013.  This will push the rollback to occur and coincide with when the new President takes office should Obama lose reelection.  If Obama wins in 2012, Congress will move the sunset date to some point further down the road so that he and that Congress can address it during Obama&#039;s second term.   ---- IMHO.)

By the way, I did make my 2010 T-IRA contribution and I did complete a conversion to a ROTH-IRA last week.  The final conversion value was about $250,000 with about $30,000 of it in non-deductable contributions.  Now the process begins to save for the federal and state taxes that will be due in the 2011 and 2012 tax years.  Estimated to be about $45,000 in taxes each year. --- OUCH !!!

Regards,
TJB

Regards,
TJB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,<br />
You make a very good point and for some people it would make sense to convert in stages over several years to stay in the lower marginal tax bracket.   However, I believe that if an individual is close to the top of their existing marginal tax bracket it makes sense to convert becuse if it takes more than 5 years to convert in portions the Congress is likely to change the marginal tax brackets within that time frame anyway.  Soemtimes it is better dealing with the devil that you know than the devil that you don&#8217;t know.<br />
However, folks do have to understand how the marginal tax brackets work.  Whatever tax bracket a person is currently in, any additional income up to that marginal tax bracket limit is taxed at that same marginal rate.  Should an individulas income push them into the next marginal tax bracket, say from 25-percent to 28-percent, does not mean that their entire income is now taxed at that 28-percent rate.  For example, if an individuals income pushed them from the 25-percent into the 28-percent tax bracket by $10,000, then the individual would have to pay 28-percent on that $10,000 or $2800, whereas the the previous $10,000 of income was taxed at 25-percent and paying $2500.</p>
<p>From the numbers that I have seen on various websites I anticiapte that the final inflation number for 2009 will show a near zero inflation rate for 2009 (if not negative).  The upward limit on the marginal tax brackets will probably not move upward very much,  if at all.</p>
<p>The real threat to the marginal tax brackets is that the law that Pres Bush signed in 2001 expires on 1 Jan 2011 (after its 10-year life) and not only do the marginal tax brackets rollback to their 2001 levels, but all the various tax credits that individuals and small business have enjoyed for the past 10 years will disappear as well.  This will mean that the 10% bracket disappears altogether.  I think (but have not confirmed) that the others brackets breakdown as follows: The 15% remains the same, the 25% moves to 28%, the 28% becomes 33%, the 33% become 35%, and the current 35% becomes 39.6%.  The upper limits on the marginal tax brackets will probably move a little higher as well.</p>
<p>(Here is my guess, or prediction, on what will happen &#8212;- Congress will see that the economy has not yet recovered enough to allow the marginal tax brackets to revert back to their 2001 levels.  They will also not have put forth any time and effort to work out what a new tax bill should contain or see which tax credits are working and which need to be changed.  Therefore, Congress will just change the sunset date on the rollback from 1 Jan 2011 to 1 Jan 2013.  This will push the rollback to occur and coincide with when the new President takes office should Obama lose reelection.  If Obama wins in 2012, Congress will move the sunset date to some point further down the road so that he and that Congress can address it during Obama&#8217;s second term.   &#8212;- IMHO.)</p>
<p>By the way, I did make my 2010 T-IRA contribution and I did complete a conversion to a ROTH-IRA last week.  The final conversion value was about $250,000 with about $30,000 of it in non-deductable contributions.  Now the process begins to save for the federal and state taxes that will be due in the 2011 and 2012 tax years.  Estimated to be about $45,000 in taxes each year. &#8212; OUCH !!!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
TJB</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
TJB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-6569</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-6569</guid>
		<description>In order to determine if converting traditional IRA to Roth will cause you to move to the higher tax bracket, you need to know the minimum taxable income (after deductions and exemptions) the next higher bracket will start at. For example,  according to IRS, the maximum taxable income for a married couple filing jointly at the 25% rate for the 2009 tax year is $137,050.  Higher than that, they are in the 28% bracket.  It is not possible to know in advance what the maximum income will be for for 2010, 2011, and later as it will be adjusted for inflation. If, say,  your 2010 taxable income from non-IRA sources is $100,000, that puts you in the 25% bracket. If you convert more than $80,000 worth of traditional IRA to Roth in 2010, you will have a taxable income of over $180,000 and that will put you in the 28% bracket if you report the entire conversion amount that year. On the other hand, if you decide to report half ($40,000) in 2011 and half ($40,000) in 2012, you stay in the 25% bracket these years if the tax brackets are adjusted upwards by at least 2.5% inflation rate each year. So we need to estimate what our taxable income is going to be before the conversion and how much we can convert to avoid being bumped up to the higher tax brackets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to determine if converting <a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/traditional-ira-rules-limits-for-2010/" >traditional IRA</a> to Roth will cause you to move to the higher tax bracket, you need to know the minimum taxable income (after deductions and exemptions) the next higher bracket will start at. For example,  according to IRS, the maximum taxable income for a married couple filing jointly at the 25% rate for the 2009 tax year is $137,050.  Higher than that, they are in the 28% bracket.  It is not possible to know in advance what the maximum income will be for for 2010, 2011, and later as it will be adjusted for inflation. If, say,  your 2010 taxable income from non-IRA sources is $100,000, that puts you in the 25% bracket. If you convert more than $80,000 worth of <a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/traditional-ira-rules-limits-for-2010/" >traditional IRA</a> to Roth in 2010, you will have a taxable income of over $180,000 and that will put you in the 28% bracket if you report the entire conversion amount that year. On the other hand, if you decide to report half ($40,000) in 2011 and half ($40,000) in 2012, you stay in the 25% bracket these years if the tax brackets are adjusted upwards by at least 2.5% inflation rate each year. So we need to estimate what our taxable income is going to be before the conversion and how much we can convert to avoid being bumped up to the higher tax brackets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJB</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5399</link>
		<dc:creator>TJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-5399</guid>
		<description>&quot;Additionally, I plan to file for an extension for the 2011 tax year so instead of paying in April 2012 (for 2011 taxes) I can wait until Oct 2012 to either pay or recharacterize the conversion back to the T-IRA. This is a safety-valve feature of the entire process.
&quot;

Opps, that is not correct.  What it actually should read is that &quot;Additionally, I plan to file for an extension for the 2010 tax year so instead of paying in April 2011 (for 2010 taxes) I can wait until Oct 2011 to either pay or recharacterize the conversion back to the T-IRA.  This is a safety-valve feature of the entire process.&quot;

Regards,
TJB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Additionally, I plan to file for an extension for the 2011 tax year so instead of paying in April 2012 (for 2011 taxes) I can wait until Oct 2012 to either pay or recharacterize the conversion back to the T-IRA. This is a safety-valve feature of the entire process.<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>Opps, that is not correct.  What it actually should read is that &#8220;Additionally, I plan to file for an extension for the 2010 tax year so instead of paying in April 2011 (for 2010 taxes) I can wait until Oct 2011 to either pay or recharacterize the conversion back to the T-IRA.  This is a safety-valve feature of the entire process.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
TJB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJB</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5342</link>
		<dc:creator>TJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-5342</guid>
		<description>Jeff and all the others,
I am convinced that if you have more than 15 years until you retire that converting a Traditional-IRA to the ROTH-IRA next year is the best thing to do.

My situation:  I am 50-years old.   I have approximately $240K in a T-IRA with about $30K of that being non-deductible contributions (contributed after tax).  I am currently in the 28-percent tax bracket.  I plan on converting the first week of Jan 2010 and selecting the option to pay the taxes equally in 2011 and 2012.   Under current tax rules this additional income to be taxed $105K in 2011 and $105K in 2012 will push me into the 33-percent tax bracket.  However, right now come Jan 1 2011 there is a roll-back on the tax brackets back to the pre-2001 levels and the two upper brackets jump to 35 and 39.4 percent.
ASSUMPTION:  I am assuming that Congress will not allow the rollback to occur (at elast in 2011) because the economy will not have fully recovered and the rollback not only affects the marginal tax brackets but also many of the taxcredits that small businesses and others have taken advantage of over the previous 10 years.  Time will tell on this assumtion over the next 12-months.

Currently, my estimated tax (federal and state) hit will be about $40K more each year (OUCH!!) in 2011 and 2012.  This is a substantial bill and has to be planned for.  One option is to increas my withholdings a little more from the paycheck.  (Either additional funds need to be withheld or estimated quarterly payments are required, or both, because of IRS rules.)  I have already set aside 30K of outside funds and have all of 2010, 2011 and into 2012 before the first $40K of additional tax is due.  Additionally, I plan to file for an extension for the 2011 tax year so instead of paying in April 2012 (for 2011 taxes) I can wait until Oct 2012 to either pay or recharacterize the conversion back to the T-IRA.  This is a safety-valve feature of the entire process.

The real benefit to the conversion is that the bottom line value of the account is all mine and the amount that it grows until retirement is all mine as well. (Unless COngress changes something.)

The one variable that no one can really predict is what tax-bracket will you be in when you retire and begin to draw on the funds.  My assumption:  Tax brackets will be higher in 15-20 years than they are now for a variety of reasons.  By paying the taxes now on the conversion I avoid any additional payments in the future.  From all the various calcualtors that I could find, and just using todays tax brackets, and that regardless of ROTH or T-IRA account would grow the same way.  It appears that if I am in a hypothetical 23-percent tax-bracket or higher that the ROTH conversion comes out ahead over the T-IRA assuming a 20-year window before I begin to draw down on the funds.  

Guideline:  If you think that your tax-bracket will be no more than 5-pecent less than the tax-bracket that you are in now, then converting comes out ahead.  Congress can make any number of changes to the tax code between now and when we draw down on the ROTHs.  My guess is that tax brackets will be higher.

I am supportive of the conversion, but the tax-bite has to really be plannned for and cannot be taken lightly.  I would also suggest not using any funds from the IRA conversion to pay the taxes for a number of reasons that is beyond what I would like to get into here.  If the window is greater than 15-years it is absolutely worth it, if the window is less than 10-years probably not.  The &quot;pivot-point&quot; appears to be right at 12-years.  Any time horizon between 10 and 15 years is really an individual, case-by, case basis and depends on other retirement fund sources and the ability to pay the tax on the conversion from outside sources.

Comments?

Regards,
TJB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff and all the others,<br />
I am convinced that if you have more than 15 years until you retire that converting a Traditional-IRA to the ROTH-IRA next year is the best thing to do.</p>
<p>My situation:  I am 50-years old.   I have approximately $240K in a T-IRA with about $30K of that being non-deductible contributions (contributed after tax).  I am currently in the 28-percent tax bracket.  I plan on converting the first week of Jan 2010 and selecting the option to pay the taxes equally in 2011 and 2012.   Under current tax rules this additional income to be taxed $105K in 2011 and $105K in 2012 will push me into the 33-percent tax bracket.  However, right now come Jan 1 2011 there is a roll-back on the tax brackets back to the pre-2001 levels and the two upper brackets jump to 35 and 39.4 percent.<br />
ASSUMPTION:  I am assuming that Congress will not allow the rollback to occur (at elast in 2011) because the economy will not have fully recovered and the rollback not only affects the marginal tax brackets but also many of the taxcredits that small businesses and others have taken advantage of over the previous 10 years.  Time will tell on this assumtion over the next 12-months.</p>
<p>Currently, my estimated tax (federal and state) hit will be about $40K more each year (OUCH!!) in 2011 and 2012.  This is a substantial bill and has to be planned for.  One option is to increas my withholdings a little more from the paycheck.  (Either additional funds need to be withheld or estimated quarterly payments are required, or both, because of IRS rules.)  I have already set aside 30K of outside funds and have all of 2010, 2011 and into 2012 before the first $40K of additional tax is due.  Additionally, I plan to file for an extension for the 2011 tax year so instead of paying in April 2012 (for 2011 taxes) I can wait until Oct 2012 to either pay or recharacterize the conversion back to the T-IRA.  This is a safety-valve feature of the entire process.</p>
<p>The real benefit to the conversion is that the bottom line value of the account is all mine and the amount that it grows until retirement is all mine as well. (Unless COngress changes something.)</p>
<p>The one variable that no one can really predict is what tax-bracket will you be in when you retire and begin to draw on the funds.  My assumption:  Tax brackets will be higher in 15-20 years than they are now for a variety of reasons.  By paying the taxes now on the conversion I avoid any additional payments in the future.  From all the various calcualtors that I could find, and just using todays tax brackets, and that regardless of ROTH or T-IRA account would grow the same way.  It appears that if I am in a hypothetical 23-percent tax-bracket or higher that the ROTH conversion comes out ahead over the T-IRA assuming a 20-year window before I begin to draw down on the funds.  </p>
<p>Guideline:  If you think that your tax-bracket will be no more than 5-pecent less than the tax-bracket that you are in now, then converting comes out ahead.  Congress can make any number of changes to the tax code between now and when we draw down on the ROTHs.  My guess is that tax brackets will be higher.</p>
<p>I am supportive of the conversion, but the tax-bite has to really be plannned for and cannot be taken lightly.  I would also suggest not using any funds from the IRA conversion to pay the taxes for a number of reasons that is beyond what I would like to get into here.  If the window is greater than 15-years it is absolutely worth it, if the window is less than 10-years probably not.  The &#8220;pivot-point&#8221; appears to be right at 12-years.  Any time horizon between 10 and 15 years is really an individual, case-by, case basis and depends on other retirement fund sources and the ability to pay the tax on the conversion from outside sources.</p>
<p>Comments?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
TJB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-5172</guid>
		<description>Thank you for putting out this information!  I have been looking forward to 2010 to convert an old 401(k).  I&#039;m 35 and have ~45k in the old account.  However, now I am reconsidering given possible negative consequences to my husband&#039;s retirement savings.  The conversion will push our joint income over the phase-out limits.  My husband works for a small employer and the ROTH is his only retirement savings vehicle (no employer-sponsored plan).  Also, we are hoping to buy a house within the next year or two, and the tax hit may affect our ability to make a 20% downpayment.  I&#039;m worried I&#039;ll kick myself if I miss this rollover opportunity.  Any advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for putting out this information!  I have been looking forward to 2010 to convert an old 401(k).  I&#8217;m 35 and have ~45k in the old account.  However, now I am reconsidering given possible negative consequences to my husband&#8217;s retirement savings.  The conversion will push our joint income over the phase-out limits.  My husband works for a small employer and the ROTH is his only retirement savings vehicle (no employer-sponsored plan).  Also, we are hoping to buy a house within the next year or two, and the tax hit may affect our ability to make a 20% downpayment.  I&#8217;m worried I&#8217;ll kick myself if I miss this rollover opportunity.  Any advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gh</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-5087</link>
		<dc:creator>gh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-5087</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff, 
Is the &quot;tax loophole&quot; statement below accurate ?  I thought the conversion tax is a pro-rata basis of all your IRA accounts?  If you already have a large IRA, funding the max amount annually into a non-deductable IRA ($5k or $6k), and then converting it to a Roth would I think only relieve a very small portion of tax liabilty.  Or is there something I&#039;m missing?
Thanks

&quot;There is a backdoor approach to this and that allows you contribute to a non-deductible IRA and then right immediately after wards convert it to a Roth IRA and avoid all taxable consequence.  It’s a nice loophole that still allows you to continue to contribute to the Roth and benefit from the tax-free money.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,<br />
Is the &#8220;tax loophole&#8221; statement below accurate ?  I thought the conversion tax is a pro-rata basis of all your IRA accounts?  If you already have a large IRA, funding the max amount annually into a non-deductable IRA ($5k or $6k), and then converting it to a Roth would I think only relieve a very small portion of tax liabilty.  Or is there something I&#8217;m missing?<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>&#8220;There is a backdoor approach to this and that allows you contribute to a non-deductible IRA and then right immediately after wards convert it to a <a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/7-things-to-know-about-roth-ira-rules-for-2010/" >Roth IRA</a> and avoid all taxable consequence.  It’s a nice loophole that still allows you to continue to contribute to the Roth and benefit from the tax-free money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rever</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>Excellent article. As a &#039;high&#039; income family, I am quite confused and this helped me out. 

Currently my wife (30) and I (36) bring home about $290,000 a year and have about $225,000 in a rollover IRA.  As our tax bracket is currently high due to income, I was wondering if rolling into a Roth would be beneficial. My gut says no, because as we are already in the highest bracket, we will be paying a large amount of taxes and when we retire, we will should be in a much lower bracket. However,  the growth of 225,000 (Post taxes) over 30 years could be substantial and not having to pay any tax 30yrs of gains is quite desirable.  Another concern is that tax rates are going to be much much higher in 30 years which would impact us, but that is debateable.

I was wondering what your thoughts are on how I should proceed. Thank you for your advice and your great column</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. As a &#8216;high&#8217; income family, I am quite confused and this helped me out. </p>
<p>Currently my wife (30) and I (36) bring home about $290,000 a year and have about $225,000 in a rollover IRA.  As our tax bracket is currently high due to income, I was wondering if rolling into a Roth would be beneficial. My gut says no, because as we are already in the highest bracket, we will be paying a large amount of taxes and when we retire, we will should be in a much lower bracket. However,  the growth of 225,000 (Post taxes) over 30 years could be substantial and not having to pay any tax 30yrs of gains is quite desirable.  Another concern is that tax rates are going to be much much higher in 30 years which would impact us, but that is debateable.</p>
<p>I was wondering what your thoughts are on how I should proceed. Thank you for your advice and your great column</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When You Should Convert to a Roth IRA &#8211; Econ4U.org</title>
		<link>http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/2010-roth-ira-conversion-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-4943</link>
		<dc:creator>When You Should Convert to a Roth IRA &#8211; Econ4U.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/?p=2003#comment-4943</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#8217;re unsure whether your tax situation justifies converting a traditional IRA to a Roth, this online evaluation by Fidelity can help you determine which move is the right one for you by estimating what paying taxes on that money now could mean for the future. Even if you out-earn the income requirements, this applies to you, too: In 2010, the law will temporarily allow high-earners to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re unsure whether your tax situation justifies converting a <a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/traditional-ira-rules-limits-for-2010/" >traditional IRA</a> to a Roth, this online evaluation by Fidelity can help you determine which move is the right one for you by estimating what paying taxes on that money now could mean for the future. Even if you out-earn the income requirements, this applies to you, too: In 2010, the law will temporarily allow high-earners to convert a <a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/traditional-ira-rules-limits-for-2010/" >traditional IRA</a> to a <a href="http://www.goodfinancialcents.com/7-things-to-know-about-roth-ira-rules-for-2010/" >Roth IRA</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.443 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-11 19:32:49 -->
