credit: Daan M
China faces a difficult choice in 2010 as rapid loan growth, necessary to sustain the economy, may begin to fuel hyperinflation. In normal times, the Chinese government uses the banking sector to send masses of low-interest rate loans to companies and sectors targeted for growth. This maintains growth and employment levels, preserving social and economic stability in a country with a massive population.
In times of stress, this aggressive lending goes into overdrive. The year 2009 has witnessed an unprecedented lending-surge by Chinese banks, who, under government direction, hoped to stave off a recession in China’s domestic economy as exports to the U.S. and rest of the world plunged. This has been a dramatic success. For example, the data reported for the month of October was very strong:
- Growth of industrial value-added, which accounts for about half of China’s GDP, accelerated to 16% year-over-year.
- Electricity production, a good growth barometer, grew by 17% year-over-year.
- Steel production set a record 44% year-over-year gain.
- Retail sales increased 16.2% year-over-year.
- Vehicle sales totaled 1.2 million (more than the 838,000 sold in the U.S. in October).
By the end of the year, the net new loans fueling this growth are likely to total more than $1.5 trillion, which would equal over a third of China’s GDP. In October, the money supply was up 29.4% year-over-year and bank loans were up by 34%. This is a massive lending spree, even by China’s standards. Much of the lending that was targeted to growth industries has leaked into the stock and real estate markets, which have rallied dramatically and are beginning to form bubbles. With subsidized loans still growing and the global economy now in recovery mode, the threat of double-digit inflation (already prevalent in India, another BRIC country) is looming.
More from GFC, Below
Adding to the inflation pressures is the fact that with the yuan pegged to the dollar over the past year, the Chinese have seen their currency plunge against their trading partners. This has resulted in higher import prices for commodities. In an attempt to prevent this, authorities have tried to pull back on lending several times in 2009. Every time, sectors of the Chinese economy start to suffer after just a few weeks, and the government ramps new loans back up again. The Chinese economy is dependent upon exports. While the decline in China’s exports narrowed to -9.1% year-over-year, from more than -20% earlier this year, it is still falling. If monetary and credit policies remain unrestrained, asset prices will continue to inflate and inflation will pose a major problem.
In the past, China’s CPI has been forecasted by commodity prices, money supply growth, and the value of the yuan versus the dollar. A simple inflation regression model using these three inputs, leading by 6 months, has a very good record of forecasting CPI and is currently pointing to over 10% inflation by the second quarter of 2010.
The challenge facing Chinese authorities is how to bring lending down to sustainable levels and tighten monetary policy without sending the economy into a tailspin with global implications. China’s authorities can either cutback on lending to curb inflation and risk social unrest and an economic slowdown or wait until exports pick up again at the risk of double-digit inflation. So far, it appears that the Chinese authorities lack the desire to rein in growth, and may continue to fuel the rise in asset prices and inflation into 2010, while the pace of inflation remains subdued.
Therefore, in the near-term, the tailwinds of growth are likely to continue to support strong performance in emerging Asia; but the consequences of high inflation on labor costs and consumer spending may require action by mid-2010. If China begins to rein in stimulus mid-year they will likely be in accord with the rest of the world, as the U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to join Australia, Canada and other central banks in hiking rates around the middle of 2010. This globally synchronized, tighter monetary policy could result in a global economic slowdown in the second half of 2010 after a strong start.
- This was prepared by LPL Financial. The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your fi nancial advisor prior to investing. All performance reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.
- Investing in international and emerging markets may entail additional risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability. Investing in small-cap stocks includes specifi c risks such as greater volatility and potentially less liquidity. Stock investing involves risk including loss of principal Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
- Small-cap stocks may be subject to higher degree of risk than more established companies’ securities. The illiquidity of the small-cap market may adversely affect the value of these investments.
- Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values will decline as interest rate rise and are subject to availability and change in price.